| |
Click the subject to go directly to the article. Click the red arrow to the right of the article to return to the top.
|
Articles posted here are © by their respective owners when designated.
Website © 2005-2011
Compiled With: Caligra 2.0.2
HOSTED BY |
|
|
Containing 4,469 Articles Spanning 328 Topics
Ex-Mormon News, Stories And Recovery
Online Since January 1, 2005
|
|
PLEASE NOTE:
If you have reached this page from an outside source such as an
Internet Search or forum referral, please note that this page
(the one you just landed on)
is an archive containing articles on
"SURVEILLANCE (SCMC)".
This website,
The Mormon Curtain
- is a website that blogs the Ex-Mormon world. You can
read
The Mormon Curtain FAQ
to understand the purpose of this website.
⇒
CLICK HERE to visit the main page of The Mormon Curtain.
|
| |
SURVEILLANCE (SCMC)
Total Articles:
9
The Strengthening Church Members Committee (SCMC) was formed by Ezra Taft Benson. It is a secret organization within the LDS Church whose sole purpose is to track down dissidents and keep records on them. It is also to keep track of anyone who speaks out against the Church. This topic includes all surveillance conducted by the Mormon Church.
|
|
| Saturday, Apr 8, 2006, at 08:33 AM Strengthening Church Members Committee Original Author(s): Infymus SURVEILLANCE (SCMC) -Guid- | ↑ | In the late 1980s, the administration of Ezra Taft Benson formed what it called the Strengthening Church Members Committee (SCMC), to keep files on potential church dissidents and collect their published material for possible later use in church disciplinary proceedings. The existence of this committee was first publicized by an anti-Mormon ministry in 1991, when it was referred to in a memo dated July 19, 1990 leaked from the office of the church's Presiding Bishopric.
At the 1992 Sunstone Symposium, dissident Mormon scholar Lavina Fielding Anderson accused the Committee of being "an internal espionage system," which prompted BYU professor and moderate Mormon scholar Eugene England to "accuse that committee of undermining the Church," a charge for which he later publically apologized (Letter to the Editor, Sunstone, March 1993). The publicity concerning the statements of Anderson and England, however, prompted the church to officially acknowledge the existence of the Committee. ("Mormon Church keeps files on its dissenters," St. Petersburg Times, Aug. 15, 1992, at 6e.) The Church explained that the Committee "provides local church leadership with information designed to help them counsel with members who, however well-meaning, may hinder the progress of the church through public criticism." ("Secret Files," New York Times, Aug. 22, 1992).
The First Presidency also issued a statement on August 22, 1992, explaining its position that the Committee had precedent and was justified based on a reference to D&C (LDS) Sec. 123, written while Joseph Smith, Jr. was imprisoned in Liberty, Missouri, suggesting that a committee be formed to record and document acts of persecution against the church by the people of Missouri.
The full purpose of the SCMC is to track down and punish dissenters in the Mormon Church.
| | Monday, Oct 16, 2006, at 08:37 AM Daniel C. Peterson Admits Being An "Agent" Of The Strengthening Church Members Committee Original Author(s): Mister Scratch SURVEILLANCE (SCMC) -Guid- | ↑ | A poster on FAIR brought up the Strengthening the Church Members Committee, apparently disquieted that such a thing even exists. During the course of the thread, most posters, notably Charity, tried to pooh-pooh away the OP's concerns, labeling them "conspiracy theory," and generally making fun of the whole thing. But what's interesting is that Prof. Peterson himself has actually functioned as an "agent" (his own word) for this committee:
Daniel Peterson wrote:
"[sic] .. was once sent out, a number of years ago, as a kind of "agent" of the Strengthening Church Members Committee. My mission? To try to help a member of the Church whose apostasy was threatening his marriage and causing anguish to his very active wife, children, and parents. (The wife and parents, and his stake president, has asked for help.) The weapons of choice? Talking with him for about four hours in Salt Lake City, in the presence of his wife and stake president, and recommending some readings."
Four hours? In a confined space? And he wants to claim that the SCMC is some kind of innocuous "newspaper clipping service"? He's got to be kidding. Further, his denials on the matter are of the "he doth protest too much" variety:
Daniel Peterson wrote:
"It's not much more than a (very) small clipping service. Trust me on this one. There is no spying or covert action. No trappings of "Mission Impossible." No non-Scientologist Tom Cruise.
Some critics have severely overheated imaginations. "
It is worth pointing out that, even if he is correct and it's only "a (very) small clipping service" (and "service" seems an odd choice of words), the "operation" would still involve people combing through newspapers, journals, blogs, etc., etc., and this really doesn't seem like a very small task. It seems that Lavina Anderson was far closer to the mark when she labeled SCMC an "internal espionage" organization. In any case, DCP appears to be in "deeper" than some may have thought.
| | Thursday, Dec 21, 2006, at 11:48 AM D&C Section 123 Does Not Mandate Church Tracking Of Anti-Mormons Original Author(s): Rollo Tomasi SURVEILLANCE (SCMC) -Guid- | ↑ | D&C 123 is not designated as a "revelation," but is a letter from JS while he was in Liberty Jail. Moreover, the language therein suggests something less than a "mandate." The first verse reads (bold mine for emphasis):
"And again, we would suggest for your consideration the propriety of all the saints gathering up a knowledge of all the facts, and suffereings and abuses put upon them by the people of this State."
In verse 4, which dicusses forming a "committee" (to which the Church cited when the SCMC was exposed back in 1992), the language is less than absolute:
"And perhaps a committee can be appointed to find out these things and to take statements and affidavits; and also to gather up the libelous publications that are afloat."
The context of D&C 123 makes it clear that the purpose was to seek redress for abuses suffered at the hands of Missourians, not to "mandate" that the Church now and forever gather up anti-Mormon info for a "testament" against its perceived enemies (or, more importantly, against those members who would dare to speak unorthodox ideas).
In addition, the three original members of the "committee" described in verse 4, Almon W. Babbitt, Erastus Snow, and Robert B. Thompson, have written that a primary purpose of the committee was to gather anti-Mormon claims in order to refut them in a church history to be compiled.
In its August 1992 statement explaining the recently exposed SCMC, the FP cited D&C 123 as authority for the SCMC. To do this takes the entire section out of context in two ways: First, it relates to info of abuses suffered by the saints in Missouri in order to seek redress from the federal government; Second, anti-Mormon info was collected by the three gentlemen of the committee in order to refut them in a church history compilation. D&C 123 was never intended to gather dirt on actual members who did not toe the party line, which is essentially the mission of today's SCMC. D&C 123 has been twisted and spun in a way that was never intended.
| | Monday, Dec 24, 2007, at 05:28 AM Surveillance Of Dissidents By The Mormon Church Original Author(s): 3X SURVEILLANCE (SCMC) -Guid- | ↑ | Found this reader response to an SLTrib "public forum letter"
http://www.sltrib.com/Opinion/ci_7732...
Poster Ben Williams: 12/16/2007 8:21:00 PM
Daryl here's the sources for the stake out on Wallace
April 5, 1977 The Salt Lake Tribune reported: "Mormon dissident Douglas A. Wallace charged Monday that a Salt Lake City police officer, shot early Sunday was keeping surveillance on him in a nearby residence. "Acting Police Chief Edgar A. Bryan Jr. denied it. "He said his men were not keeping surveillance on Mr. Wallace, a excommunicated member of the Church...but he would not say what the stakeout's purpose was. “Officer David W. Olson remained in critical condition Monday at St. Mark's Hospital, where personnel said he suffered a severed spinal cord from a single shot in the neck. The policeman was shot accidentally by his partner,... Wallace was staying at the home of a friend, Dr. John W. Fitzgerald, 2177 Carriage Lane. (4600 South). "He was in Salt Lake City to try to make an appearance at the LDS World Conference last weekend. Attorneys for the church, however, obtained a temporary restraining order...which prevented the dissident from visiting Temple Square. "'I have not committed any crime, and I don't intend to commit any crime. I have been raised in the Mormon faith and I am a man of peace...This is not Russia; this is not Nazi Germany; there is no reason why I should be under surveillance of the police,' Mr. Wallace said."
6 April 1977 Salt Lake Tribune related: "Ex-Mormon Douglas Wallace, who claims the wounding of an undercover police officer was done while police held surveillance on him, Tuesday afternoon said he will subpoena various high ranking police and sheriff's deputies to establish the fact.... "Mr. Wallace said also, 'It is clear from the evidence that we have uncovered that I was under surveillance. The police department's denial of that simply compounds the wrong. Is this going to be Salt Lake's sequel to the Watergate scandal?'" (Salt Lake Tribune, April 6, 1977)
8 April 1977 With Mr. Wallace and his attorney pressing them hard, the police were finally forced to admit the truth about the matter: "Salt Lake City police officers admitted Thursday that the accidental wounding of an undercover officer occurred during surveillance of Mormon dissident Douglas A. Wallace.... "Reports released Thursday by both the county sheriff's office and the county attorney show that six officers were on stakeout around the John W. Fitzgerald home...where Mr. Wallace was staying. "The lawmen were paired up in three police vehicles and two of those were parked close together in opposite directions..." (Salt Lake Tribune, April 8, 1977)
18 Jan 1978 Letter to Editor of the Salt Lake Tribune, "I would also like to thank Spencer W. Kimball for his incorrect press release concerning the police involvement combined with the LDS church's efforts to restrict Douglas A. Wallace from the temple grounds, specifically the Tabernacle, on April 3, 1977. "His denial of these actions is wrong. Any man who can take such actions and still call himself a prophet deserves more than I to be confined to this wheelchair." David Olson (SLC Police officer who was accidentally shot and paralyzed while putting Douglas Wallace under surveillance by Mormon official pressure on the police force.
Detective David W. Olson joined the police department in October 1971 and was a combat veteran of the Vietnam war. Olson had served in the Patrol, K-9, and Special Investigations Division. He was known to his close friends as "Hagar".
In the early morning hours of April 3, 1977, Olsen, while in the performance of his duties was accidentally wounded. As a result of his injuries, he was unable to return to active duty and died on March 22, 1980.
| Yes I remember John W. Fitzgerald well. Of course, I had no idea of how admirable a man he truly was, nor his courage in taking a stance against the shameful racism of the church.
My memories are those of a grade schooler:
I remember his announcement about the death of JFK: I was in the second grade that year.
I also remember that he wrote poetry and one year a teacher (probably my six grade teacher Mrs. Britten) chose some of the "best" artists to illustrate a few of them. It must have been a kind of nature poem because I remember doing a coloured pencil drawing of a stream, waterfall and ferns.
Also in the 6th grade we had a debate with various teams drawn up discussing various important issues of the day like----whether it was ok for men to have long hair (!) This would have been around 1966 or 67, and my argument consisted mostly of holding up a picture of Jesus! Dr. Fitzgerald had come to our class for the debates and I remember him laughing uproariously at my "point;" I was surprised at his hearty laugh, since it wasn't usual in his role as school Principal/disciplinarian.
I owe wings and Cabbie email (I'm fine, just having a very intense period in my life right now: lots of changes going down), and had I actually been corresponding with them like I should have been I would have written about walking down to Morningside while I was in SLC a few months ago and sitting on the steps drinking a beer and thinking about Dr. Fitzgerald and many other Morningside denizens.
I also thought about him while driving past Carriage Lane many times while I was home (my grandmother was buried in the cemetary just south of there and after her death I went to her graveside nearly every day).
I wish I had known more about him while he was alive, I consider him to be one of the "people's heroes" of Utah history...
| | Monday, Dec 24, 2007, at 05:55 AM I Purposely Went To Dr. Fitzgerald's Funeral Original Author(s): SL Cabbie SURVEILLANCE (SCMC) -Guid- | ↑ | I Purposely Went To Dr. Fitzgerald's Funeral to see if he'd returned to the church. He hadn't, and his papers--some of which were on display at the service--can be found in a collection at Utah State University. You can access a description of the contents (and some of the writings) on-line (try Google; I've got the URL somewhere on another hard drive, as does et in Utah).
Douglas Wallace was there at the service, as was another dissident who was a little dismayed that his family played down his apostacy (Sandra Tanner spoke to me of knowing "Fitzy" well at an Exmo Conference, as did Gerald who was still alive at the time); there were several references to his penchance for naps when they would visit, and my friend said he was just ducking arguments about the church, that when he visited him in the past, he was lively and animated.
I last saw him about five years before he died (in his 90's), and I regret not bringing up the subject of religion (we did discuss our mutual "editorial writing" in general terms, and he remembered who I was). I was doing some maintenance work at the Carriage Lane condos, and I recognized his voice so I said hello. The second day I was there, he asked me if I would carry some mail out to his mailbox, and he accidentaly dropped them. He was embarrassed that they were some Publisher's Clearing House entries and things like that, but it only made him all the more human an loveable to me . . .
Doug Wallace was permitted to speak right at the end of the service and praised Fitzgerald's courage; immediately after, a member of the family (and an obvious PH holder) invited Wallace to leave (somewhat politely, but I was saddened although not entirely shocked) saying he'd been allowed to have his say . . .
I've collected several good second and third-hand accounts (from law enforcement sources; one was Robert Kirby) about the shooting, and apparently a defective safety was the cause of the accident when one officer passed the holstered 9mm automatic to the other and it discharged (I'd always been curious about how that happened). Not the best example of gun safety, but a tragic event with no malice involved . . .
Kirby noted he thought the officers were responding to a suggestion from above that "these two should be watched" and said if it happened today the policeman's union would've raised a huge stink . . .
I dunno . . . I told the story to Will Bagley last month, and his remark was "And that was after Skousen [W. Cleon Skousen who was police chief for a short time during the 60's] left, right?" As I recollect, Dewey Fillis was Salt Lake Police Chief at the time . . .
BTW, Olson's death mentioned below was a suicide . . .
Nothing much to add unless there are some other Morningside alums who want to honk their horns as well...
| | Thursday, Dec 27, 2007, at 07:01 AM The Tanners Discuss The John F. Fitzgerald Account Original Author(s): 3X SURVEILLANCE (SCMC) -Guid- | ↑ | Excerpted from:
http://www.ondoctrine.com/1mormo23.ht...
Material originally extracted from "The Changing World Of Mormonism", Jerald and Sandra Tanner; Moody Press, Chicago, 1981; Chapter 10.
Since 1976 the Mormon church was repeatedly embarrassed by one of its own members who became alienated over the anti-black doctrine and decided to take matters into his own hands. On April 3, 1976 the Salt Lake Tribune reported that Douglas A. Wallace "ordained a black into the priesthood Friday, saying he did so in an attempt to force a revision in Mormon doctrine about the Negro race.... Wallace said he has long been bothered by the Mormon Church's bias against blacks, and he feels the time has come to challenge it. He said often all that is required to change a policy is for someone to break out of tradition ... he hopes there are no recriminations against him for his action, such as excommunication."
On April 13, 1976 the Salt Lake Tribune revealed that "Douglas A. Wallace was excommunicated from the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints Sunday for ordaining a black man into the church's priesthood." After a confrontation with church personnel at an April conference session, Mr. Wallace was ejected from the Tabernacle. Later he was served with "a court order barring him from attending conference" (Ibid., October 4, 1976).
Although we did not agree with some of Mr. Wallace's ideas on religion, we did not consider him to be dangerous and we were rather surprised to notice the close surveillance the police kept him under when he walked along the public sidewalk outside of Temple Square. The fear of the threat Mr. Wallace presented to the church seems to have led to a tragic incident where a policeman was accidentally shot and permanently paralyzed. This occurred at the time of the church's conference held in April, 1977. The Salt Lake City police had placed a stakeout around a home where Wallace was staying and at 4:20 A.M. on a Sunday morning one of the policemen accidentally shot his partner. At first the police "denied" that they had Mr. Wallace under surveillance (see Salt Lake Tribune, April 5, 1977), but when Wallace pressed for an investigation the police were forced to admit the truth about the matter: "Salt Lake City police officers admitted Thursday that the accidental wounding of an undercover officer occurred during surveillance of Mormon dissident Douglas A. Wallace.... Reports released Thursday by both the county sheriff's office and the county attorney show that six officers were on stakeout around the John W. Fitzgerald home ... where Mr. Wallace was staying" (Salt Lake Tribune, April 8, 1977).
Douglas Wallace claimed that the Mormon church "was behind April police surveillance ... that led to the accidental shooting of a Salt Lake City police officer" (Ibid., September 17, 1977). Finally, David Olson, the disabled police officer, took exception to a press release issued by the church. In a letter to the editor of the Salt Lake Tribune, January 18, 1978, Mr. Olson attacked President "Spencer W. Kimball for his incorrect press release concerning the police involvement combined with the LDS church's efforts to restrict Douglas A. Wallace from the temple grounds, specifically the Tabernacle, on April 3, 1977. His denial of these actions is wrong. Any man who can take such actions and still call himself a prophet deserves more than I to be confined to this wheelchair."
Douglas Wallace filed lawsuits amounting to millions of dollars against the Mormon church, and although he was not able to prevail against the church in the courts, the publicity surrounding the suits caused the church no end of trouble. We feel that his actions and the embarrassment they caused the church played a part in bringing about the decision to have a new "revelation."
| | Monday, Jun 16, 2008, at 08:01 AM You Can Run, But You Can't Hide / How The Mormon Church Tracks You Down Original Author(s): Mujun SURVEILLANCE (SCMC) -Guid- | ↑ | For the first 18.5 years of my life, I lived at the same address. For the next 20 years thereafter, I probably had 20 addresses. During most of that time, I was diligent about getting in touch with my new ward right after - or sometimes even before - each relocation. If I knew my new address before a move, I often provided that to the clerk in the ward I was leaving. That made it easy for my records to catch up to me in short order, or sometimes even beat me to the new locale.
My most recent move was a different story. I had already reached my own conclusions, and had high hopes that my wife and children would take the same path. I had no motivation to share my new address with anyone at church. My wife wasn't necessarily averse to having the new ward know about us. In fact, she was generally thinking that she wanted to connect with them. Fortunately for me, she didn't know how the system works. She didn't provide the old ward with a specific street address for the home to which we were moving. She did give them the name of the city, but the missing degree of detail proved to be the critical difference.
I've been a branch president and an elders quorum president, so I have some experience with what the processes look like from an administrative standpoint. When a member moves out of a ward, the bishop and the clerk want to get the records out too. They send notice to church headquarters with the names and membership numbers of the members who have moved. If they know the exact address to which the member is moving, they provide that too. The functionaries at headquarters can then use the address to determine the new ward and send the records there.
If the clerk at the old ward doesn't have the members new address, he sends the records to church headquarters anyway. Sometimes, the records only spend a short amount of time there until the member gets in touch with his new ward and they, in turn, get in touch with church headquarters and request the records.
Sometimes, membership records arrive in Salt Lake City from the old ward with no forwarding address attached, and no subsequent request arrives from a new ward. Those records get sent to the "dead pile." I wouldn't expect the church to disclose any details about the number of records in the pile, but I suspect that when they boast about their total number of members, the number is quite a bit higher than just those who are assigned to wards or branches. There was an article a year or two ago in the Salt Lake Tribune that told how service missionaries spend countless hours trying to find these people.
One of the most common and most effective ways they get people out of the dead pile is to get their Mormon relatives to rat them out. When I was an elders quorum president in a really fluid California ward, the ward clerk would often hand us cards that were requests from church headquarters. The cards would have the name of a member they were trying to locate, and the name of a relative of that member who lived in our ward. We were assigned to contact the local member - who was often an inactive or almost totally uknown member himself - and ask for a current address or other contact information for the member in question. Whenever such contact information was obtained, it was forwarded to Salt Lake City so that they could move another record out of the dead pile and make it some ward's problem.
A relative of mine had managed to drop off the Mormon radar screen for a few years. The clerk in his mother's ward asked her for his current address, which she happily provided. Within a few weeks, home teachers from the local ward were knocking on his door.
Common courtesy dictates that you don't give out a friend or relative's contact information without getting his or her permission to do so first. Most active Mormons, however, don't think twice about sharing this kind of information with "the church." Common courtesy be damned if they think it will save you from the same fate. If the Mormons managed to track you down after a move, chances are good that one of your close Mormon relatives ratted you out.
On our last move, we made it more than seven months before we heard from the local Mormons. Fortunately, it was long enough. By that time, our whole family had grown quite attached to our new Unitarian Universalist church community. I have since resigned. My wife and kids are still officially on the Mormon records, but I have to give the local ward some credit for generally leaving us alone.
I did have an idea to buy us more time, but ended up not needing to try it. Here's how it goes. When you're moving out of a ward, give the ward clerk a bogus forwarding address. Send them on a good, old-fashioned wild goose chase. A little research with the church's own ward/meeting locator on their website can help you identify a place that's really, really remote in relation to the closest ward or branch. An island off the coast of Maine with weekley ferry service only in the summer might be a good choice. Your records would be sent to the appropriate branch, which could be many miles from the address you gave. When the branch gets your records, they have to keep them until they verify that you don't live there, which could take months. From there, you go to the dead pile, which personal experience has taught me can be worth another several months.
| | Monday, Feb 16, 2009, at 08:10 AM My Name In Chad Hardey's Secret BYU Spy File Original Author(s): Anonymous SURVEILLANCE (SCMC) -Guid- | ↑ | So I get a call this evening from a friend on the other side of the country telling me that she's seen my name and comments on Chad Hardey's excommunication/BYU diploma fiasco on Chad Hardey's website.
That's right, in the section called "academic record", which is comprised of news articles, excerpts from Chad's Facebook page, and other blogs, there in black and white is a comment I left on a certain blog (which was a very obscure one that had, at its most popular time, fewer than 200 readers a day) concerning BYU's propriety (or lack thereof) concerning Chad's excommunication and BYU's yanking his diploma.
FREAKY!!!!!!! How in the world did BYU get wind of a comment I left on a very obscure blog? Why would they take the time to print my comment (and yes, I used my real name as I do when I post here) and add it to Chad Hardey's "academic file". The Honor Code Office truly is Big Brother.
Who else has a large "academic" file with "evidence" collected by the (dis)Honor Code Office? So it is clear that BYU keeps these kind of CIA/KGB files on students...does the LDS Church keep the same kind of stuff?
WOW....can I just say WOW!
But, not surprising. The young woman who notified me of this startling (to me) find also informed me that she has drafted her resignation letter over this whole mess.
Take that, LDS Inc.!
| |